The Museum of Accidents is an online collection of photographs sharing the common theme of something gone badly, or even most horribly wrong.
The collection is separated into categories such as Environmental Pollution, Industrial Accidents (my favourite), Deliberate Accidents (is there such a thing?) and Wreck and Derailments, among others.
This site taps into the vulture in everyone. It does have some amazing images, such as a street suffering the aftermath of the Kobe earthquake.
As a result of its controversial content, this site does become morally questionable and for some, storms into uncomfortable territory. It is clear that some people died in some of the accidents featured, so is it right to include them in the collection?
The description of "accident" is also obviously a grey area. The dictionary says it's, "An unexpected and undesirable event, especially one resulting in damage or harm."
I don't know what the criteria was for placing the Lockerbie Air Crash under the 'deliberate accident" category, or even more shockingly, the collapse of the Twin Towers. I feel no need to include those pictures here.
What do you think?
Stats for Morally Questionable Virtual Curation
Trending: Older & Average
Research: 19,773 clicks in 401 w
Interest: 4 minutes
Concept: Morally Questionable Virtual Curation
Related: 56 examples / 43 photos
Segment: Neutral, 18-35
Comparison Set: 20 similar articles, including: nestle chocolate museum, virtual shoe museum ii, and burnt food museums.
Morally Questionable Virtual Curation
More Stats +/-
Virtual Shoe Museum II
Nestle Chocolate Museum
Burnt Food Museums
Toaster Museums + 10 Odd Toasters You Might Find There
Barf Bag Collectors