Christopher Ketchem is extremely frustrated at what he perceives to be a global sense of indifference to recent studies that suggest cell phones might be dangerous to the health of their users.
In a five page expose on the evidence behind the theory and the stagnated sense of awareness that remains despite it, he warns in this GQ article that the opportunity to tackle this major concern before it becomes a disastrous problem is one that should not, under any circumstance, be passed up. And thus, like Ralph Nader with seat-belts before him, Christopher Ketchem and other proponents for tougher and more rigorous cell phone regulation have a tough road ahead of them.
Time will tell if he is on the right side of history.
Lethal Phone Activists
Christopher Ketcham Criticizes Phone Safety Apathy
Trend Themes
1. Cell Phone Safety - Advancing technology in cell phone safety, such as radiation-blocking cases, can be a disruptive innovation opportunity in this space.
2. Public Health Awareness - An innovative awareness campaign educating the public on the dangers of cell phone radiation could change consumer behavior around cell phone purchases and usage.
3. Regulatory Changes - The opportunity to push for regulatory changes to mandate cell phone safety features represents a potential disruptive shift in the telecommunications industry.
Industry Implications
1. Telecommunications - Telecommunications companies are under pressure to address cell phone safety concerns, creating opportunities for innovators to develop and market safer devices.
2. Consumer Electronics - As consumers become more aware of the potential dangers of cell phone radiation, companies that provide safe alternatives to traditional cell phones could disrupt the consumer electronics industry.
3. Public Health - Growing concern around the health risks of cell phone radiation could prompt innovation in the public health sector, including medical research and education initiatives.