#1 in Trends Become a Trend Hunter:   Login or Join Now   Add a Trend
Trends Logo
   ALL    Tech    Fashion    Sex    Pop Culture    Celebs    Ads    Business    Eco    Art & Design    Life    Luxury    Science    Bizarre   More [+/-]
mediterraneanmediterranean
713 Trends
5,720,000 Views
215 Comments

SUBSCRIBE
Twitter Trends
Facebook Trends
Trend Report Newsletter
Trend Hunter TV
Trend Hunter Mobile
Trend Hunter RSS


Anti-Paparazzi Law Proposed Edit
'Britney's Law'


Digg this TrendStumble this TrendShare this TrendEmailthis TrendEmbed This TrendShare This Trend



Anti-Paparazzi Law Proposed - 'Britney's Law'
'Britney's Law'
Published: Feb 13, 08
Comments: 14
Views: 3,080

With the recent drama surrounding Britney Spears, the world’s awareness was raised concerning the issue of how close paparazzi can get to the celebrity and how far they could push the privacy and public safety envelope. It was 11 years ago when Princess Diana died of severe injuries from a fatal car accident that was surrounded by paparazzi controversy. Now the authorities are seeking a new law, being dubbed ‘Britney’s Law’, that would prevent similar tragedies and give celebrities the chance of a somehow normal life.

The L.A. City Council is considering an ordinance that would impose a 20-yard “personal safety bubble” around those public figures in the city who are construed by the law to be “paparazzi targets.” If the proposed Britney Law is implemented, it will be the most stringent anti-paparazzi legislation of its kind to date. If a paparazzo crosses the 20-yard “personal safety bubble” without permission, the city will confiscate all profits from any resulting photograph.

The proposal raises a host of thorny legal issues, most notably, the First Amendment right of the press to facilitate communication of information to the public. We can surely expect the multi-million paparazzi industry to put up a big fight.

References:  newsmax

Filed In:  celebs leaders pop culture








Reactions

FOUR WAYS TO REACT: vote, favorite, add more examples of Anti-Paparazzi Law Proposed or comment about 'Britney's Law'.

macoROCKS on Feb 14, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments
I like the idea behind this law. I mean, I can't even stand when my husband takes up too much space on our bed! Coulnd't imagine what it would be like to have a bunch of strangers flahsing pictures at your face! I hope this law goes into effect.
macoROCKS on Feb 14, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments 0
Going Like Sixty on Feb 14, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments
Not in the U.S. Restricting the rights of the free press is a big no-no. And I sure hope it stays that way. If this goes for Britney, it will apply next to criminals, then politicians. Slippery slope.
Going Like Sixty on Feb 14, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments 0
Ayman Helweh on Feb 14, 08  2,236 Trends   2,641 Comments
I hardly think the paparazzi qualify as 'free press'. Reporting is one thing, flashing a 100 lights in someones face while hes getting in his car and driving, then following them in high speed is inviting tragedy, not reporting.
Ayman Helweh on Feb 14, 08  2,236 Trends   2,641 Comments 0
macoROCKS on Feb 15, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments
I agree with ayMan. Plus reporting on criminals and politicians news, can not in my opinion, be compared, or put in the same light, as following a Hollywood star around, on their girls night out! I think the "free press" already fell down the slippery slope on this so called "free reporting".
macoROCKS on Feb 15, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments 0
Terri on Mar 11, 08  0 Trends   1 Comments
I think its about time something like this came into effect. Freedom of press in this situation is taken too far. We as a public (if interested in some shots they get) are that bored that we feel compelled to know when a celebrity went to the bathroom etc, then shame on us. Freedom of press in any regards needs to be looked into. My husband and I was in a one car crash (no alcohol or drugs involved) that ended up killing my husband at the scene, it was not 5 minutes and news cameras surrounded the scene flashing pictures etc. For days all over the news and the papers they had the picture of my husbands body laying (though covered with the imfamous black bag) on the gurney being wheeled to the coroners van. This pic was also shown with one of him layin on the ground covered except for his shoes. All anyone needed to know was he died, there was no sense in showing his dead body, just for the cameramans "wow factor" to attempt to win "props" for his coverage.
Terri on Mar 11, 08  0 Trends   1 Comments 0
Going Like Sixty on Mar 11, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments
@Terri: Restricting freedom of the press is like being a "little bit pregnant." You either have complete unfettered freedom of the press or you don't. You felt that taking pictures of a body bag was wrong. I don't see the problem. It's news. Sounds to me like the photographers were aware of the pain showing your husband outside the body bag could cause. Don't forget, these decisions are made by producers and editors. I bet there was a photo of your husband before he was bagged. "Freedom of the press needs to be looked into" is a silly emotional statement.
Going Like Sixty on Mar 11, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments 0
Ayman Helweh on Mar 12, 08  2,236 Trends   2,641 Comments
I am with ya all the way Terri. Not everything has to be extreme, either allow freedom of press or block it. Any profession needs regulations and control, from doctors to lawyers. And the state and nature of press and paparazzi has dramatically changed in the last 10 years, which calls for a review and re-thinking of the laws. Sometimes we hold ideals high, but when you are the subject of scrutiny you see under a different light.
Ayman Helweh on Mar 12, 08  2,236 Trends   2,641 Comments 0
macoROCKS on Mar 15, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments
Terri...So sorry for your loss. I guess you can rest assured that what goes around comes around...one day, all of those shallow a-holes will get that same kind of treatment they gave you and your husband and that very emotional time. Too bad you could shove their cameras up their butts...it seems to me that if paparazzi are able/allowed and somehow entitled to totally invade your privacy at THE MOST inappropriate times, that you shouldn't be able to freely express yourself violently against them. I say, we either regulate the whole paparazzi thing OR we totally un-regulate meaning, we get to get away we reacting freely (and maybe violently) towards these scummy paparazzis.
macoROCKS on Mar 15, 08  10 Trends   23 Comments 0
Going Like Sixty on Mar 15, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments
@macroROCKS & AyMan: shove it up WHO's butt? Time, People, Guardian, LaMonde, etc? Who decides? Rethink a law that is the foundation on which the U.S. was built? Who rethinks it? Who defines the parameters? Free press is FREE. Not "kinda" free. One of the first things dictators do is seize the media to stop the free flow of information. For a democracy to succeed there must be robust and unfettered discussion. Anything less and the U.S. is headed to anarchy.
Going Like Sixty on Mar 15, 08  2,882 Trends   1,499 Comments 0


Welcome Back!

New? Sign-up FREE [+/-]

Username
Remember Me!
Password
Forgot your password?




Become a Trend Hunter

Already a Member? Log in HERE [+/-]
Username &
Portfolio URL
TrendHunter.com/
Full Name
Password
Password Confirm
E-Mail Address
You will be sent a confirmation e-mail to complete registration.

 Subscribe to our FREE Weekly Trend Newsletter
         Privacy by SafeSubscribe

 I agree to the Terms of Service

Terms of Services

All messages posted at this site express the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the owners and administrators of this site. By registering at this site you agree not to post any messages that are copyright violations, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We will permanently ban all users who do so.

We reserve the right to remove, edit, or move any post for any reason. Our terms of service are subject to change without notice. Potential changes could relate to the layout, content, and / or revenue sharing. Content added to Trend Hunter may be edited before publication and becomes property of Trend Hunter Inc. Trend Hunter Portfolios could be removed or banned at any time, which could occur due to copyright violation, click fraud, abuse of any of our rules or for any other reason.


Submit the word you see below:







TREND HUNTER
is the world's largest trend spotting and cool hunting community. It is an explosion of cool trends and ideas, fueled by a global network of trend spotters and cool hunters. By tracking the evolution of cool, Trend Hunters stimulate creativity and generate breakthrough ideas.

About Us   Journalim Internships   Trends   Trend Reports   Tools   Store   RSS (98 Flavors)   Innovation Keynotes   Exploiting Chaos   Terms of Use   Tips / Contact     Join
0.7299 - Hosted by web1
Trends and Content Copyright © TREND HUNTER Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Anti-Paparazzi Law Proposed